OSSI (Obesity and Metabolic Surgery Society of India) Guidelines for Patient and Procedure Selection for Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: India is the largest hub for bariatric and metabolic surgery in Asia. OSSI is committed to improve the quality of care and set the standards for its practice in India. METHODS: The first draft of OSSI guidelines was prepared by the secretary, Dr. Praveen Raj under the guidance of current President, Dr. Arun Prasad. All executive council members were given voting privileges, and the proposed guidelines were circulated on email for approval of the executive council. Guidelines were finalized after 100% agreement from all voting members and were also circulated among all OSSI members for their suggestions. RESULTS: OSSI upholds the BMI criteria for bariatric and metabolic surgery of 2011 IFSO-APC guidelines. In addition to this, we recognize that waist circumference of ≥ 80 cm in females and ≥ 90 cm in males along with obesity related co-morbidities may be considered for surgery. In addition to standard procedures as recommended by IFSO, OSSI acknowledges the additional procedures, and a review of literature for these procedures is presented in the discussion. CONCLUSION: The burden of obesity in India is one of the highest in the world and with numbers of bariatric and metabolic procedures rising rapidly; there is a need for country specific guidelines. The Indian population is unique in its phenotype, genotype and nutritional make up. This document enlists guidelines for surgeons and allied health practitioners as also multiple other stake-holders like primary health physicians, policy makers, insurance companies and the Indian government.

Correction to: Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

This article was updated to include the middle initial of author L. N. Jorgensen's name.

Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS)): Part B.

In 2014 the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias". Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based-Medicine. For the present update all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne) the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite still insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initially guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.

Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias (International Endohernia Society (IEHS))-Part A.

In 2014, the International Endohernia Society (IEHS) published the first international "Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias." Guidelines reflect the currently best available evidence in diagnostics and therapy and give recommendations to help surgeons to standardize their techniques and to improve their results. However, science is a dynamic field which is continuously developing. Therefore, guidelines require regular updates to keep pace with the evolving literature. METHODS: For the development of the original guidelines, all relevant literature published up to year 2012 was analyzed using the ranking of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. For the present update, all of the previous authors were asked to evaluate the literature published during the recent years from 2012 to 2017 and revise their statements and recommendations given in the initial guidelines accordingly. In two Consensus Conferences (October 2017 Beijing, March 2018 Cologne), the updates were presented, discussed, and confirmed. To avoid redundancy, only new statements or recommendations are included in this paper. Therefore, for full understanding both of the guidelines, the original and the current, must be read. In addition, the new developments in repair of abdominal wall hernias like surgical techniques within the abdominal wall, release operations (transversus muscle release, component separation), Botox application, and robot-assisted repair methods were included. RESULTS: Due to an increase of the number of patients and further development of surgical techniques, repair of primary and secondary abdominal wall hernias attracts increasing interests of many surgeons. Whereas up to three decades ago hernia-related publications did not exceed 20 per year, currently this number is about 10-fold higher. Recent years are characterized by the advent of new techniques-minimal invasive techniques using robotics and laparoscopy, totally extraperitoneal repairs, novel myofascial release techniques for optimal closure of large defects, and Botox for relaxing the abdominal wall. Furthermore, a concomitant rectus diastasis was recognized as a significant risk factor for recurrence. Despite insufficient evidence with respect to these new techniques, it seemed to us necessary to include them in the update to stimulate surgeons to do research in these fields. CONCLUSION: Guidelines are recommendations based on best available evidence intended to help the surgeon to improve the quality of his daily work. However, science is a continuously evolving process, and as such guidelines should be updated about every 3 years. For a comprehensive reference, however, it is suggested to read both the initial guidelines published in 2014 together with the update. Moreover, the presented update includes also techniques which were not known 3 years before.

Previously implanted intra-peritoneal mesh increases morbidity during re-laparoscopy: a retrospective, case-matched cohort study.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) with intra-peritoneal mesh placement is standard surgical treatment of abdominal wall hernias. During laparoscopic re-intervention, we examined adhesions that develop after previous intra-peritoneal mesh placement and ascertained morbidity and risk of adverse events. METHODS: This is a retrospective, case-matched comparison of three patient groups-previous intra-peritoneal mesh (Group A), previous abdominal surgery (Group B) and no previous abdominal surgery (Group C). Matching was based on surgical procedure performed during laparoscopic re-intervention in Group A. Adhesions were described as grade, extent of previous mesh/scar involvement, involvement of abdominal quadrants and dissection technique required for adhesiolysis, each component being assigned value from 0 to 4. Total adhesion score (TAS) was generated as summative score for each patient (0 to 16). Access/adhesiolysis-related injuries, additional port requirement, deviations from planned surgery, operative time and length of hospital stay was noted. Relative risk of adverse events, i.e., inadvertent injuries and deviations from planned surgery, was calculated for Group A. RESULTS: Adhesion characteristics were most severe (highest TAS) in Group A. Access injuries occurred in 5, 4, 1.3% in Groups A, B, C, respectively. Adhesiolysis-related injury rate was 9%, 2.6% in Groups A, B, respectively. Relative risk of adverse events was 4 for Group A (compared to Groups B and C combined). Additional port requirement was highest for Group A. Mean operative time and length of hospital stay was significantly longer in Group A for LVHR. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-peritoneal mesh placement is associated with adhesion formation that may increase risk during subsequent laparoscopic surgery.

Minimally Invasive Anal Fistula Treatment (MAFT)-An Appraisal of Early Results in 416 Patients.

Minimally invasive anal fistula treatment (MAFT) was introduced to minimize early postoperative morbidity, preserve sphincter continence, and reduce recurrence. We report our early experience with MAFT in 416 patients. Preoperative MRI was performed in 150 patients initially and subsequently thereafter. The technique involves fistuloscope-aided localization of internal fistula opening, examination and fulguration of all fistula tracks, and secure stapled closure of internal fistula opening within anal canal/rectum. MAFT was performed as day-care procedure in 391 patients (93.9 %). During surgery, internal fistula opening could not be located in 100 patients (24 %). Seven patients required readmission to hospital. Mean visual analog scale scores for pain on discharge and at 1 week were 3.1 (1-6) and 1.6 (0-3), respectively. Mean duration for return to normal activity was 3.2 days (2-11 days). Fistula recurrence was observed in 35/134 patients (26.1 %) at 1 year follow-up. MAFT may be performed as day-care procedure with benefits of less pain, absence of perianal wounds, faster recovery, and preservation of sphincter continence. However, long-term results from more centers are needed especially for recurrence.

Iatrogenic enterotomy in laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single center experience of 2,346 patients over 17 years.

PURPOSE: Iatrogenic enterotomy (IE) during laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LIVHR) is reported to be associated with poorer surgical outcomes. We report our experience with diagnosis, management and complications in patients who had IE during LIVHR at our tertiary referral institute between 1994 and 2011. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data of 2,346 patients who underwent LIVHR from 1994 to 2011. We identified 33 patients who had IE during LIVHR. All surgical procedures were performed by five consultants and fellows under supervision who followed a standardized operative protocol. Patients were followed up for 6 months to evaluate morbidity, mortality, additional surgical procedures, unplanned readmissions and hospital stay. RESULTS: Mortality occurred in 2 patients (6 %). Complications occurred in 16 patients (48.5 %). Median hospital stay was 3 days (2-36). Unplanned readmission was required in 6 patients (18 %). In 18 patients, (55 %) additional surgical procedures were required within 6 months of LIVHR. In 5 patients, the enterotomy was recognized postoperatively. These patients had worst outcomes [mortality 40 %, additional surgical procedures were required in all patients (100 %) and median hospital stay was 12 days (range 7-36)]. CONCLUSION: Iatrogenic enterotomy is a serious complication during LIVHR. IE is associated with mortality, morbidity, additional surgical procedures, unplanned readmissions and prolonged hospital stay. In patients where IE was recognized postoperatively, the prognosis was worst.

Single port versus multiple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a comparative study.

Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SPLC) was introduced to minimize postoperative morbidity and improve cosmesis. We performed a comparative study to assess feasibility, safety and perceived benefits of SPLC. Two groups of patients (104 each) with comparable demographic characteristics were selected for SPLC and multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) between May 2010 to March 2011. SPLC was performed using X cone® with 5 mm extra long telescope and 3 ports for hand instruments. MPLC was performed with traditional 4 port technique. A large window was always created during dissection to obtain the critical view of safety. Data collection was prospective. The primary end points were post-operative pain and surgical complications. Secondary end points were patient assessed cosmesis and satisfaction scores and operating time. The mean VAS scores for pain in SPLC group were higher on day 0 (SPLC 3.37 versus MPLC 2.72, p = 0.03) and equivalent to MPLC group on day 1(SPLC 1.90 versus MPLC 1.79, p = 0.06). Number of patients requiring analgesia for breakthrough pain (SPLC 21.1 % versus MPLC 26.9 %, p = 0.31) was similar. Number and nature of surgical complications was similar (SPLC 17.3 % versus MPLC 21.2 %, p =0.59). Mean patient assessed cosmesis scores (SPLC 7.96 versus MPLC 7.16, p = 0.003) and mean patient satisfaction scores (SPLC 8.66 versus MPLC 8.16, p = 0.004) were higher in SPLC group indicating better cosmesis and greater patient satisfaction. SPLC took longer to perform (61 min versus 26 min, p = 0.00). Conversion was required in 5 patients in SPLC group. SPLC appears to be feasible and safe with cosmetic benefits in selected patients. However, challenges remain to improve operative ergonomics. SPLC needs to be proven efficacious with a high safety profile to be accepted as standard laparoscopic technique.

Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard for gallbladder removal and the most common laparoscopic procedure worldwide. With the advent of laparoscopic surgery and its continuous development, the focus has shifted to 'scarless' surgery. In recent times, the innovative technique of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has been applied in gallbladder removal and even more complex biliopancreatic procedures to further minimize the invasiveness of the surgery. Newer developments in laparoscopic equipments and instrumentation have helped to further evolve this field of minimally invasive surgery. Literature search was performed using the following online search engines: Google, Medline, PubMed, Cochrane, and the online Springer link library. The terms used for the search were as follows: SILS, LESS, single-incision laparoscopic surgery, single-port laparoscopic surgery, SILS cholecystectomy, and SILS pancreatic surgery. Articles that matched the search criteria were selected and extensively reviewed. Moreover, pertinent information on instrumentation and technology for SILS and LESS was obtained by accessing websites of manufacturers. Although SILS represents the search for an essentially scarless surgery, there is still not a widespread use and uniformity of this procedure. SILS is performed either by single- or multiple-port technique. In the present article, we present a review of the potential benefits, limitations, and risks of SILS in biliary and pancreatic diseases. There are many studies showing benefits in cholecystectomy. A few case reports have also emerged about its feasibility in procedures such as cystogastrostomy and limited pancreatic resection. Further research and development of this technique is needed to arrive at a tangible conclusion about the perceived benefits of SILS. Randomized studies to compare SILS with traditional laparoscopy are essential.

Management of common bile duct stones in the laparoscopic era.

There is no consensus regarding the ideal management of concurrent gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones. Currently the treatment protocol involves most commonly a sequential approach consisting of endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy or a single stage laparoscopic procedure, including cholecystectomy and exploration of the CBD. For this article literature search was performed using online search engines, Google, Pubmed, the online Springer link library and the Cochrane Database Systematic Review. Review articles, prospective and retrospective studies which detailed or compared the various treatment strategies for CBD stones were selected and analyzed. This review article aims to provide an insight into the optimal management of CBD stones in different clinical scenarios. Endoscopic sphincterotomy has inherent morbidity and complications like CBD stone recurrence whereas laparoscopic CBD exploration demands considerable expertise which is available only at specialized centres. The clinical presentation of the patient, number of stones, size of CBD, available resources and technical expertise at hand are an important consideration for the ideal management in different scenarios.

Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: a single centre experience of 1,242 patients over a period of 13 years.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Laparoscopic technique is now well established for ventral/incisional hernia repair. However several issues such as optimal fixation technique, occult hernias, management of inadvertent enterotomies, postoperative seromas and recurrence require appraisal. METHODS: A single centre retrospective review of 1,242 patients between January 1992 and June 2005 is described. All patients had laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) following a standardised protocol by five consultants and fellows in a dedicated minimal access surgery unit of a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: LVIHR was completed in 1,223 patients (98.5%). The average BMI was 32, mean defect size was 26.2 cm(2), mean operating time was 81 min and mean hospital stay was 1.9 days. The mean mesh to hernia ratio was 37.5. Occult hernias were observed in 203 (16.3%) patients and inadvertent enterotomies occurred in 21 (1.7%) patients. Mortality occurred in two patients, pulmonary embolism and cardiac dysrhythmia being the respective reasons. The most common sequel was early seroma formation (25%). Chronic pain occurred in 14.7% patients. Recurrence rate was 4.4%, which was associated with a higher BMI, use of staplers as fixation device, multiple defects and recurrent hernias. The mean follow up was 5.4 years; (range 2.4-10 years). The follow up rate was 78%. CONCLUSION: LVIHR leads to low recurrence rates and low rates of wound and mesh infection. Occult hernias are diagnosed and optimally treated laparoscopically. However, chronic pain remains an unresolved issue.

Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: The purported advantage of lightweight large-pore meshes is improved biocompatibility that translates into lesser postoperative pain and earlier rehabilitation. However, there are concerns of increased hernia recurrence rate. We undertook a prospective randomized clinical trial to compare early and late outcome measures with the use of a lightweight (Ultrapro) mesh and heavyweight (Prolene) mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) groin hernia repair. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on 402 patients (191 in Ultrapro and 211 in Prolene group) with bilateral groin hernias who underwent endoscopic TEP groin hernia repair from March 2006 to June 2007. All operations were performed by five consultants following a standardized operative protocol. Chronic groin pain and hernia recurrence were evaluated as primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measure were early postoperative pain, operative time, number of fixation devices required to fix the mesh, return to normal daily activities of work, seroma, and testicular pain. RESULTS: At 1-year follow-up, incidence in Ultrapro versus Prolene group for chronic groin pain was 1.6% vs. 4.7% (p = 0.178) and recurrence was 1.3% vs. 0.2% (p = 0.078). In Ultrapro versus Prolene group, mean visual analogue score for postoperative pain at day 7 was 1.07 vs. 1.31 (p = 0.00), mean return to normal activities was 1.82 vs. 2.09 days (p = 0.00), and mean number of fixation devices per patient required to fix the mesh was 4.22 vs. 4.08 (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Lightweight meshes appear to have advantages in terms of lesser pain and early return to normal activity. However, more patients had hernia recurrence with lightweight meshes, especially for larger hernias. We surmise that the lightweight meshes have greater tendency to get displaced from their intended position during desufflation at the conclusion of endoscopic TEP repair.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: an Indian experience-surgical technique and early results.

BACKGROUND: Obesity has been observed to be on the rise in the Indian subcontinent. We report our early experience with the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for treating morbid obesity in the Indian population along with description of the surgical technique. METHODS: The data of 75 patients who underwent LSG for the treatment of morbid obesity at the Minimal Access, Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Centre, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi, from November 2006 to February 2009, were retrospectively reviewed from prospective database. The gastric sleeve is created laparoscopically using sequential firings of a linear stapling device applied alongside a 36-Fr calibrating bougie. The data collected included age, gender, initial body mass index (BMI) and excess weight, the co-morbidity status, and preoperative investigations. Perioperative parameters and follow-up details [weight, BMI, excess weight loss (%EWL), resolution of co-morbidities, and postoperative investigations] were noted. RESULTS: All procedures were completed laparoscopically. There was no major procedure-related morbidity. Hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion was observed in four patients. One patient died at 2 weeks postoperatively due to pulmonary embolism. There was a steady rise in %EWL from 31.2% at 3 months to 52.3% at 6 months, 59.13% at 1 year, and 65% at 2 years. Type II diabetes was resolved in 81.2%, hypertension in 93.75%, and dyslipidemia in 85% at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Although long-term results are necessary to determine the benefits of the procedure, early results indicate that LSG may be a safe and feasible option for treating the morbidly obese patients.

Endomyocardial fibrosis.

We present a case report of a 26-year-old male from Bulandsahar, India. The patient presented with right heart failure. Evaluation revealed peripheral eosinophilia. An echocardiogram and MRI showed biventricular hypertrophy with obliteration of the ventricular apices, typical of endomyocardial fibrosis. This condition is rare in Bulandsahar, India.

Agenesis of gallbladder - our experience and a review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Agenesis of gallbladder is a rare congenital anomaly. Variable diagnostic approaches, perioperative management strategies and postoperative follow up protocols provide a dilemma to its correct diagnosis and management. METHODS: We hereby present five patients with agenesis of gallbladder encountered in our institution between 1992 to 2008. Four out of five patients had symptoms suggestive of gallstones including upper abdominal pain and acid dyspepsia, which were further substantiated by ultrasound reports showing shrunken contracted gallbladder with calculi. RESULTS: On laparoscopy the gallbladder was absent in all five patients leading to conversion to laparotomy in the initial three patients. With increasing experience, the next two patients were diagnosed conclusively by laparoscopy to have agenesis of gallbladder, without the need for conversion which was further confirmed by post operative imaging studies. CONCLUSION: Gallbladder agenesis is rarely encountered in clinical practice. With increased experience in laparoscopy, the condition no longer mandates conversion to laparotomy for confirmation of diagnosis. Symptomatic improvement occurs in all patients following surgical intervention.

Laparoscopic repair of incarcerated ventral abdominal wall hernias.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopy in the management of incarcerated (irreducible) ventral hernia remains to be elucidated. We present our experience of the laparoscopic repair of incarcerated primary ventral and incisional hernias over an 8-year period. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of 112 patients undergoing laparoscopic repair for incarcerated primary ventral and incisional hernias from January 1998 to February 2006 was performed. The patient demographics, perioperative data, and postoperative complications were assessed. RESULTS: The procedure was completed entirely laparoscopically in 103 patients (91.9%) with the placement of intraperitoneal mesh. A sutured tissue repair (without mesh) was performed in seven patients and hernia repair was abandoned after laparoscopy in two patients. Five patients required limited conversion by a targeted skin incision for the resection of nonviable bowel (three patients) and to complete adhesiolysis within multiloculated hernial sacs (two patients). The contents of the hernial sacs were incarcerated omentum (42 patients), small bowel (28 patients), large bowel (six patients), and omentum and small bowel (34 patients). Of these, seven patients presented with signs of acute small-bowel obstruction. The mean size of the largest defect through which incarceration occurred was 3.5 +/- 1.6 cm (range 1.5-7.5 cm) and the mean size of the mesh used was 379 +/- 210 cm2 (range 225-780 cm2). The mean operative time was 96 +/- 40.8 min (range 50-170 min). Inadvertent enterotomy occurred in four patients during bowel reduction and adhesiolysis. In two patients, the enterotomy was repaired by total laparoscopy followed by mesh placement, and two patients required conversion to formal laparotomy due to long-segment tears and peritoneal contamination. The average postoperative hospital stay was 2.8 +/- 1.5 days (range 1-6.5 days). Postoperative complications occurred in 20.5% patients. There was no mortality. Hernia recurred in three patients at a mean follow-up of 48 +/- 28.3 months (range 1-84 months). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic ventral abdominal wall hernia repair can be safely performed with a low complication rate, even in incarcerated hernias. Careful bowel reduction with adhesiolysis and mesh repair in an uncontaminated abdomen with a 5-cm mesh overlap remain key factors for a successful outcome.

Limited-conversion technique: a safe and viable alternative to conversion in laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair.

BACKGROUND: During laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair (LVIHR), conversion to conventional (open) technique is required when safe adhesiolysis is not possible, incarcerated bowel in hernial sac cannot be reduced or for repair of iatrogenic enterotomies. A formal laparotomy in these circumstances entails significant morbidity due to factors such as wound infection, prolonged immobility, and longer hospital stay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a period between 1994 and 2007, 1,503 LVIHRs were performed at our centre following a standardized protocol by five consultants and fellows. Out of these, 6 patients had a formal laparotomy in the initial part of our experience and 26 patients had a limited conversion to facilitate completion of LVIHR. We have devised the term "limited conversion" for the procedure wherein bowel reduction/adhesiolysis/enterotomy repair was performed through a small targeted skin incision. This was followed by laparoscopic placement of intraperitoneal mesh. RESULTS: Conversion to an open procedure was required in 32 (2.1%) out of 1,503 LVIHR procedures. Twenty-six patients underwent a limited conversion and completion of the repair by laparoscopy. All but one of these patients had intraperitoneal placement of mesh by laparoscopic route. The wound complication rate was 3.8% (one patient), the mean hospital stay was 2.1 days, and mean operative time was 124 min. CONCLUSION: Limited conversion offers a safe alternative to a formal laparotomy in patients with bowel incarcerated in hernial sacs or in patients requiring extensive bowel adhesiolysis. Patient morbidity is reduced due to the targeted skin incision whilst retaining several advantages of a minimal access approach viz. laparoscopic evaluation of the entire abdominal wall and placement of a large intraperitoneal prosthesis.

[Not Available].

Spigelian hernia occurs through slit like defect in the anterior abdominal wall adjacent to the semilunar line. Most of spigelian hernias occur in the lower abdomen where the posterior sheath is deficient. The hernia ring is a well-defined defect in the transverses aponeurosis. The hernial sac, surrounded by extraperitoneal fatty tissue, is often interparietal passing through the transversus and the internal oblique aponeuroses and then spreading out beneath the intact aponeurosis of the external oblique. Spigelian hernia is in itself very rare and more over it is difficult to diagnose clinically. It has been estimated that it constitutes 0.12% of abdominal wall hernias. The spigelian hernia has been repaired by both conventional and laparoscopic approach. Laparoscopic management of spigelian hernia is well established. Most of the authors have managed it by transperitoneal approach either by placing the mesh in intraperitoneal position or by raising the peritoneal flap and placing the mesh in extraperitoneal space. There have also been case reports of management of spigelian hernia by total extraperitoneal approach. We retrospectively reviewed our experience of ten patients between 1997 and 2007. Eight patients (8/10) presented with abdominal pain and two patients (2/10) were asymptomatic. In six patients (6/10) we performed an intraperitoneal onlay IPOM repair, in two patients (2/10) transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP), and in two (2/10) total extraperitoneal repair (TEP). There were no recurrences, or other morbidity at mean follow up period of 3.2 years (range 6 months to 10 years).

Laparoscopic management of large hiatus hernia with mesh cruroplasty.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopy has become the standard surgical approach to surgery for gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and hiatal hernia repair with excellent long-term results and high patient satisfaction. However several studies have shown that hiatal hernia repair, especially large hiatus are associated with high recurrence rate. Mesh reinforcement has been proposed for repair of large hiatus hernia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of mesh cruroplasty in management of large hiatus hernia (> 5 cm). METHODS: Between February 2002 to December 2007, 73 patients (28 men and 45 women) who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with mesh cruroplasty were included in our study. Mesh reinforcement (cruroplasty) was used for repair of large hiatus hernia (>5 cms hernial defect). Mean age was 50.4 years (range 30-72 years). Follow up included barium swallow of patients at 3 months and yearly thereafter. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients underwent mesh cruroplasty for large hiatus hernia. We were able to adequately mobilise the oesophagus to achieve an intra-abdominal length of at least 3 cm in all patients. Intraoperative complication rate was 8.21% (6/73), intraoperative complications included pleural tear, bleeding from splenic capsule laceration and short gastric vessels. Postoperative complication rate was 4.1% (3/73), which included complete dyspahgia, atelactasis and pneumonia. Mean duration of hospitalisation was 3.5 days (range 3-9 days). Five patients (5/73) were lost to follow up. Four patients (5.8%) developed recurrence on routine follow up. No mesh related complications were noted on long-term follow up period. Mean follow up period was 3.2 years (range 5 months-6 years). CONCLUSION: Our data supports the use of mesh in hiatal hernia repair, especially in large hiatus hernia as it leads to low recurrence rates. Longer follow up and more randomised controlled trials are needed to establish laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty as standard technique for large hiatal hernia repair.

Endoscopic neck surgery.

Endoscopic surgery in the neck was attempted in 1996 for performing parathyroidectomy. A similar surgical technique was used for performing thyroidectomy the following year. Most commonly reported endoscopic neck surgery studies in literature have been on thyroid and parathyroid glands. The approaches are divided into two types i.e., the total endoscopic approach using CO(2) insufflation and the video-assisted approach without CO(2) insufflation. The latter approach has been reported more often. The surgical access (port placements) may vary-the common sites are the neck, anterior chest wall, axilla, and periareolar region. The limiting factors are the size of the gland and malignancy. Few reports are available on endoscopic resection for early thyroid malignancy and cervical lymph node dissection. Endoscopic neck surgery has primarily evolved due to its cosmetic benefits and it has proved to be safe and feasible in suitable patients with thyroid and parathyroid pathologies. Application of this technique for approaching other cervical organs such as the submandibular gland and carotid artery are still in the early experimental phase.